Don’t miss anything! Sign up for my newsletter & join our Facebook community of 1,000+ like minded thinkers!

Quick answer: Yes, adult men and women can be real friends, and many are. But the research is clear that attraction in cross-sex friendships is common, is felt more often by men, and is experienced far more often as a burden than a benefit. The question gets harder, not easier, once you are married. When one person is attracted to the other, and the two spend long hours together at work or travel together for work, a “friendship” can quietly become the most dangerous relationship in a marriage. Friendship is possible. Naivety is not wise.
Few questions start more arguments at a dinner party. One side calls the question outdated: of course men and women can be friends; it is the twenty-first century. The other side quotes When Harry Met Sally and smiles knowingly. Both sides are partly right, and that is exactly why the question deserves more than a slogan.
I want to answer it the way I try to answer every hard question: with honest philosophy, the best research I can find, and the wisdom of the Christian tradition. And I want to say plainly where I land. For single adults, cross-sex friendship is good and often beautiful. For married adults, it is possible, but it becomes more complicated the more attraction, time, privacy and emotional intimacy are involved. The burden of proof shifts. And the workplace is where most marriages are actually tested.
In The Four Loves, Lewis distinguishes friendship from romantic love with a famous image: lovers stand face to face, absorbed in each other; friends stand side by side, absorbed in some common interest. Friendship is always about something: a shared truth, cause or passion.
Lewis believed friendship between a man and a woman was entirely possible. But he also warned that when two unattached people of the opposite sex discover they share that “secret road,” the friendship will very often slide into romance, sometimes within the first half hour. He did not think this was shameful; he thought it was human. Friendship and Eros are different loves, but they live next door to each other, and the door between them is easy to open.
Notice Lewis’s word: unattached. He was describing what happens when nothing is lost if the friendship becomes romance. Marriage changes the arithmetic entirely.
The best-known study comes from psychologist April Bleske-Rechek and colleagues, published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (2012). They brought 88 pairs of opposite-sex college friends into the lab and had each friend answer privately, after promising confidentiality and that neither would see the other’s answers. The pattern was striking: men reported more attraction to their female friends than the women reported toward them. Men also tended to overestimate how attracted their female friends were to them, while women tended to underestimate their male friends’ attraction. In other words, many men are hoping for more, and many women do not realize it.
Even more telling, men’s attraction to their friend did not depend much on whether they themselves were already in a relationship. Being taken did not switch the attraction off.
In a second study, the same team surveyed younger adults (average age about 19) and older adults (average age about 37, roughly 90% married) about the costs and benefits of their cross-sex friendships. About a third of participants listed attraction as a cost or complication, roughly five times as often as they listed it as a benefit. The researchers’ summary was simple: attraction between cross-sex friends is common, and it is perceived more often as a burden than as a benefit.
Here is the finding that matters most for married people. Among young women, and among both the men and the women in the older (mostly married) sample, greater attraction to a cross-sex friend was associated with lower satisfaction with their current romantic partner. The study is correlational, so it cannot tell us which comes first. But either direction is a warning: a struggling marriage makes a friend look more attractive, and an attractive friend makes a marriage look more disappointing. Each feeds the other.
Social psychology has known for decades that we tend to like and become attracted to people we simply see often. Festinger, Schachter and Back’s classic housing study (1950) found that friendships formed largely according to physical distance between apartments. Robert Zajonc’s research on the mere-exposure effect (1968) showed that repeated exposure alone increases liking. Neither effect requires bad intentions. It simply means that the person you see eight or ten hours a day has a structural advantage over the spouse you see, tired, for two hours in the evening.
Arthur Aron and colleagues found that couples who do novel, challenging activities together report increased relationship quality (Aron et al., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000). Earlier, the famous Capilano bridge study (Dutton and Aron, 1974) suggested that arousal from an exciting or anxious situation can be misread as attraction to the person you are with. Think about what that means for a business trip: a new city, a high-stakes presentation, the adrenaline of winning the deal, dinner afterward, a hotel bar. These are exactly the conditions research associates with bonding, and they are happening with your colleague, not your spouse.
For a single person, a cross-sex friendship that turns romantic may be a happy ending. For a married person, the same development is a betrayal in progress. That is why I argue that the question changes with marriage. Three factors in particular raise the risk sharply:
The late psychologist Shirley Glass, one of the most respected researchers on infidelity, spent decades studying couples recovering from affairs. Her book Not “Just Friends” (2003) made an argument that surprised many readers: most of the affairs she treated did not begin with lust or a deliberate decision to cheat. They began as friendships between ordinary, decent people who never intended to cross a line. They slid.
Glass offered a helpful image: walls and windows. In a healthy marriage, a couple has a window between them (openness and honesty with each other) and a wall that protects the marriage from outsiders. In an emotional affair the structure is reversed. A window opens with the friend, who now hears your private thoughts, frustrations and hopes, and a wall goes up with your spouse, who is no longer told what is happening. When you find yourself hiding the content of your conversations with a friend from your spouse, the walls and windows have already moved.
If you want to know where real-world infidelity tends to begin, look at work. In Glass’s clinical practice, she reported that 46% of unfaithful wives and 62% of unfaithful husbands had an affair with someone they knew through work (Glass and Staeheli, 2003). These were clinical figures from her own practice, not a national survey, but they match what therapists and pastors see constantly.
National workplace data point in the same direction. In a 2023 survey by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), conducted with NORC at the University of Chicago, 27% of U.S. workers said they were in or had been in a workplace romance, and 40% said they had flirted with a coworker. Almost a quarter (24%) said they had had a “work spouse,” and of those, about one in five (20%) said they had developed romantic feelings for that person.
Pause on that phrase: work spouse. We use it as a joke, but it describes something real: a colleague who knows your moods, finishes your sentences, shares your daily wins and losses, and sees you at your most competent and admired. Your actual spouse sees you exhausted, distracted and taking out the trash. It is not a fair contest, and that is precisely the danger.
Travel combines nearly every risk factor the research identifies: long uninterrupted time together, novelty, shared stress and success, alcohol, privacy, distance from home, and the feeling that “normal rules” are suspended. Many good people who would never cheat at home find themselves saying and feeling things on the road they never anticipated. Wisdom does not wait for the moment of temptation to decide; it decides beforehand.
Scripture does not forbid friendship between men and women. Jesus had close female friends and followers: Mary, Martha, Mary Magdalene and others who traveled with and supported his ministry (Luke 8:1–3; John 11:5). Paul names women such as Phoebe and Priscilla as valued co-workers (Romans 16). Friendship across the sexes is part of the Christian story.
But Scripture is also blunt about the human heart. “The heart is deceitful above all things” (Jeremiah 17:9). Jesus located adultery not only in the act but in the heart’s desire (Matthew 5:28). Proverbs warns that a man cannot carry fire in his lap without being burned (Proverbs 6:27). And Paul tells the church to “flee” sexual immorality (1 Corinthians 6:18), not to debate it, manage it or see how close they can get.
The Christian view is not that the opposite sex is dangerous. It is that we are. The person most likely to rationalize a slow drift is not the villain; it is the good man who is sure he would never do that.
In 1948 Billy Graham and his team resolved never to travel, meet or eat alone with a woman other than their wives. It protected his ministry from scandal for decades, and some leaders still follow it. Critics rightly point out that strict versions can exclude women from mentoring, meetings and promotions, and can treat every woman as a temptation rather than a colleague. I think the wise path for most professionals lies between naivety and suspicion: not a blanket rule that sidelines women, but honest, specific guardrails based on your own heart, your own marriage and your own situation.
Yes. Many single men and women enjoy rich, lasting friendships, and many married people have healthy friendships across the sexes, especially when those friendships are open, include their spouses and are not carrying hidden attraction.
But the honest answer for married adults is: yes, carefully. The more attraction is present, the more time you spend together, the more private and emotionally intimate the friendship becomes, and the more it lives inside the long hours of work and travel, the less it remains “just” a friendship. Love, as Lewis said, begins to be a demon the moment it begins to be a god, and a friendship can quietly become a god long before anyone does anything wrong.
Ask yourself: Is there anyone in my life I talk to in ways I would not want my spouse to hear?
Many marriage researchers and therapists treat it as a serious breach of trust, and many betrayed spouses say the emotional intimacy hurt more than any physical act would have. Shirley Glass described emotional affairs as involving secrecy, emotional intimacy and sexual chemistry, even without physical contact. If you are hiding it, it is already a problem.
Not always, but you should change it. That may mean reducing private time, involving your spouse, or, if the attraction is strong and mutual, ending the closeness altogether. Jesus’ language about cutting off what causes us to stumble (Matthew 5:29–30) is deliberately severe. A friendship is not worth a marriage.
Take your spouse’s discomfort seriously. They may see something you cannot, or they may need reassurance. Either way, a marriage is a partnership of two consciences, and love does not insist on its own way (1 Corinthians 13:5).
A trusted colleague you work well with is a gift. The phrase becomes a problem when the relationship starts meeting emotional needs that belong in your marriage. If your colleague knows more about your inner life this month than your spouse does, it is time to rebalance.
Want to talk it through? Many of the successful men and leaders I coach are not struggling with strategy. They are trying to protect their marriages and families under the pressure of demanding careers, long hours and constant travel. If that is where you are, I offer a free, confidential, no-pressure 15-minute conversation.